|
|
Columnists who were/are
Real Curmudgeons
"Curmudgeon" has been around since at least 1577 when it
appeared in print. I don't know what is the matter with today's young
people. They don't know perfectly respectable terms like "curmudgeon."
I bet they don't even know a "currant" from a "current."
Or how to "curry" or when to add "curry." Or a hyphen
from a dash. They can be so cursedly curt when they are called on their
cursory curriculum fulfillment.
By now do you know the hallmark of the curmudgeon? This ill-tempered
person is full of resentment and stubborn notions. At least the voice
(tone) that the columnist takes makes him appear not to care. Perhaps
this is why satire and a cast of characters often appear in these columns.
Three pros of the pessimistic voice: H.L. Mencken,
Mike Royko and Andy Rooney
make a fascinating study of writing and history as reflected in their
columns.
H.
L. MENCKEN
In "Mother's Day" he sprinkles acid on people he rejects then
gives some kind words about mothers. This Baltimore Sun writer was known
for his sarcastic vitriol. Read some of his columns. Can you identify
examples of it. Don't be fooled by the appearance of courtesy.
In "Criminology" note his use of abstract and concrete terms
as he argues his position against those who are wrong, of course: "It
was simply a natural reaction against the doctrine that murder is mainly
an accidental and unfortunate matter, and devoid of moral content, like
slipping on an icy sidewalk or becoming the father of twins." Satire,
understatement and attack on this form of ethics are used against his
opposition.
In "Why Nobody Loves a Politician" note his diction carefully.
What level of language is used to underscore his point? Does he include
himself as a victim of politicians?
Mencken's Biography
MIKE
ROYKO
Have you daily frustrations from encounters with modern technology that
is far from flawless? You should be able to relate to "How to Kick
a Machine." Dialogue is another effective tool of the curmudgeon.
Royko's writing style is direct, unadorned and specific. He prefers
short, clear Anglo-Saxon words to long, more obscure Latinate ones.
Royko saw himself as the voice of the common man. Note his wit in "The
Ethics of Endorsing a Product." What side is he on?
(If you have time, you can compare his style and approach to that
of Fran Lebowitz in "Clothes with Words and /or Pictures on Them"
and that of Ellen Goodman in "One Season Fits All.")
The May 24, 1999, issue of The New Yorker The Wayward Press critic Hendrik
Hertzberg writes an appreciation of Royko. In "Big Mike: When he
went, it left a hole in the soul," Hertzberg writes that Royko
was the soul of Chicago. "He landed the column [in the afternoon
Daily News] at the end of 1963 and wrote it for thirty-three years,
right up until March 21, 1997, a few days before he suffered the stroke
that put him in the ground, halfway into the sixty-fifth year of his
age.
Some eight thousand columns, eight or nine hundred words
each - something approaching seven million words."
Royko was the first soul-of-the-city columnist to be syndicated on a
large scale, according to Hertzberg.
ANDY
ROONEY
Sometimes Andy Rooney is facetious and very effectively makes you believe
in "Teaching from the Classifieds" that language skills would
be stronger if the classifieds were used as the textbook. He begins
with a satirical prescription and ends with a demonstration of "teaching
from the classifieds." The lists add humor in that their skepticism
works due to contrast with the presumed innocence of the children.
As he often does on Sixty Minutes, Rooney in "Job Applicants"
is pedantic, experienced with words and able to impart wisdom. Note
that is criticism often have an element of truth with which the reader
can agree.
In the overview of the three curmudgeons, a few of their many columns
illustrated characteristics of their approaches. Read more of the works
of H. L. Mencken, Mike Royko and Andy Rooney to find your own examples
of these characteristics.
|